When I had to
review the first “It” movie in 2017, I procrastinated for a week before I got
it done, because I didn’t know what to write. Not that the movie was bad, but it
just wasn’t scary at all. This time I have to write a review of “It Chapter 2”
and so far, I have been procrastinating for three weeks…
Like the first
movie, this sequel is directed by Andy Muschietti, and the story is set twenty-seven
years after The Losers’ Club first encountered It/Pennywise the dancing clown.
After a homosexual man is murdered in Derry, Maine, by It, the adult Mike
Hanlon (Isaiah Mustafa) who stayed in Derry as a librarian while the other six
club members moved away, convinces his childhood friends to return to Derry and
honour the promise, they made in 1989 to kill It if it came back. Not all of
them make it back to Derry and those who do have only hazy memories of their
childhood. Mike helps them remember and convinces them that the Native American
ritual of Chüd can stop It for good, but it requires seven personal items from
the past. The members venture out into Derry to find their items and they each encounter
It. At the same time, their old bully Henry Bowers (Teach Grant), who has
survived what looked like a fatal fall into a well in the first movie, breaks
out of a mental institution where he has spent the past twenty-seven years. It
helps him of course, and Henry starts hunting down the Losers. The grand finale
takes place in the underground cave beneath the sewers under the Neibolt house
where the Losers must fight for their lives against a giant Pennywise.
So far so good, except,
the film is never really good. There is of course great stuff in the movie, like
references to other horror films such as “The Thing” and “The Shining” (written
by “It’s author Stephen King) and the recurring joke about people not liking
the ending of Bill’s stories, which hints at Stephen King often being criticized
that his endings are no good .All in all “It Chapter 2” is a very funny film,
but that is not just good, I guess, as this is a horror film that’s supposed to
be scary, which it is not.
Furthermore, the movie
is way too long. Even though the story jumps between 2016 and 1989 (as the
story in the first film apparently took place here and not in 1984-85 as
originally reported), 2 hours and 49 minutes is ridiculous.
Then there’s the cast.
Where the young cast consisting of Jaeden Martell (Bill), Sophia Lillis
(Berverly), Jeremy Ray Tayler (Ben), Chosen Jacobs (Mike), Finn Wolfhard (Richie),
Jack Dylan Grazer (Eddie) and Wyatt Oleff (Stanley) are as brilliant as in the
first movie, the adult cast who play the Losers as grown-ups are kind of bland.
With Isaiah Mustafa (Mike) as the only exception, the adult cast flops at
making their characters interesting and three-dimensional. They are just characters.
This is a major problem, because who cares what happens to Bill (James McAvoy),
Beverly (Jessica Chastain), Ben (Jay Ryan), Richie (Bill Hader), Eddie (James
Ransone) and Stanley (Andy Bean), when you can’t identify with any of them?
They don’t even look like grown up versions of the young cast!
And then there’s
Pennywise, of course, the dancing clown, It, played by Bill Skarsgård. I’m sure
Skarsgård tries his best, but his clown is still too silly-looking to be scary.
I think I compared Pennywise to the White Rabbit from “Alice in Wonderland”,
the last time, so let me take it one step further this time and call him the
bastard child of the White Rabbit and the Mad Hatter!
When it comes to
acting, the cameos are much more interesting than the Losers and It, especially
Stephen King himself, who has a wonderful part as the shopkeeper at Derry’s
Second Hand Rose. Other cameos are the movie’s director Andy Muschetti as a
customer in the pharmacy, the famous movie director Peter Bogdanovich as the
director Peter and finally as the Big Guy in Ben’s meeting scene you can spot
Brandon Crane, who played Ben as a kid in the “It” mini-series from 1990.
As for the plot, I
think that the many changes from the book and the mini-series are often
questionable. Like, why are we still introduced to Bill’s wife and Beverly’s
violent boyfriend when they are not to be seen in any other scenes? They both
played much bigger parts in the book and the series and so did Henry Bowers. Instead
we get a lot of new scenes that don’t do any good to the flow of the story.
Besides – and I
have to write SPOILER ALERT - the way the Losers defeat Pennywise in the end is
just ridiculous, because if this kills It, It would have been dead hundreds of
years ago. Don’t tell me that no one has come up with that idea before, seeing
how silly Pennywise looks!
The biggest
disappointment to me is, however, that Maturin, the wise and benevolent cosmic
turtle, is nowhere to be found in “It Chapter 2” despite the many hints at his
presence in the first movie. Instead, the sublime macrocosmic fundament of the
plot has been changed to a Native American ritual. Without Maturin, the
universe of “It” becomes very small, and in my opinion way too small to justify
such a loooooong and semi-trivial flic.
Like the first “It”
movie, “It Chapter 2” isn’t a bad movie, it just isn’t good either, so once
again I end up giving three out of five stars: ***
