Last week I was invited to the Danish premiere of Wess Ball’s film “The Maze Runner” and I brought along my teenage daughter who fits right in with the young adult target audience.
Usually when I’m going to a premiere I do a
bit of research in advance, but I didn’t this time and that was a huge mistake.
You see, when entering the cinema, I didn’t know that “The Maze Runner” is
based on the first book in the young-adult post-apocalyptic science fiction
trilogy by James Dashner and thereby had no ending, and that was a great
disappointment for me.
Anyway, “The Maze Runner” tells quite an
exciting story about the teenage boy Thomas who wakes up in a glade with no
memory of his previous life. Here he meets the Gladers, other teenage boys who
arrived in The Glade in the same way as Thomas, some as long as 2 years ago, but
now they live in a community where they farm the land of The Glade. The Glade is situated in the middle of a giant
maze, and some of the boys called “Runners” explore the maze during daytime in
order to find a way out. However, at nightfall the maze closes its doors to The
Glade and no one is able to survive a night in the maze when it is roamed by
giant robot insects called The Grievers. Thomas, who has strange dreams about a
mysterious organization known as W.C.K.D, wants to become a maze runner and at
one point, the first and only girl turns up in The Glade and sparks off the
action.
Thomas is brilliantly played by Dylan O’Brien
and worth mentioning are also Aml Ameen as the Glade leader Alby, Blake Cooper
as Thomas’ friend Chuck, Ki Hong Lee as the maze runner Minoh, Will Poulter as the
broody Gally and especially Thomas Brodie-Sangster as the second in command
Newt. They are all very talented, but the maze itself is a bit disappointing,
as I had hoped for different scary creatures and things to happen and not just
Grievers. Furthermore Thomas’ background and the post-apocalyptic story behind
the plot is a bit flimsy and easy to figure out and frankly a bit of a
disappointment when you’ve waited to get out of that maze for 113 minutes (the
audience) or 2 years (The Gladers), whatever seems the longest.
I really liked “The Maze Runner” up until
the last 15 minutes or so as they were very disappointing, and I felt cheated
when I left the cinema. However, I do realise that it is partly my own fault
for not knowing that this was a “Part 1”-film, but then again it’s the fault of
the film too, as the maze was just too boring! I’m not sure if I’m going to see
part 2 and 3, so for now I’m just going to give part 1 three out of three
stars: ***